I have to agree with the original poster. I have used SS for some time now, and I have grown used to the name. It is an original name and nothing wrong there, but it is not very good in a marketing sense.
Personally I would strip the servant part, and rename and rebrand the package. Choose some ...
Search found 3 matches
- 07 May 2006, 18:47
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: great product - lousy name
- Replies: 44
- Views: 78955
- 07 May 2006, 18:28
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Feature: restore the deleted file (Undo)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5834
ctrl-z
Actually this makes sense.. With this feature in SS I would actually see a reason to have a recyclebin.. I usually never use the recyclebin feature..
I might even say it would be nice if SS had a recyclebin option all by it self. One that could be configured to automatically be active on ...
I might even say it would be nice if SS had a recyclebin option all by it self. One that could be configured to automatically be active on ...
- 07 May 2006, 18:04
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: U3 Portable version
- Replies: 7
- Views: 16907
U3 Portable version
Are there any plans to maybe add a version that is U3 portable ?
Or is it allready possible to install and use independent of the install?
If so isnt an installer version possible. It is a growing market as far as i can tell. John Haller and the Portableapps.com site would be a nice platform to ...
Or is it allready possible to install and use independent of the install?
If so isnt an installer version possible. It is a growing market as far as i can tell. John Haller and the Portableapps.com site would be a nice platform to ...