Search found 3 matches
Search found 3 matches • Page 1 of 1
- 07 May 2006, 18:47
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: great product - lousy name
- Replies: 44
- Views: 40527
I have to agree with the original poster. I have used SS for some time now, and I have grown used to the name. It is an original name and nothing wrong there, but it is not very good in a marketing sense. Personally I would strip the servant part, and rename and rebrand the package. Choose some swee...
- 07 May 2006, 18:28
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Feature: restore the deleted file (Undo)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2981
Actually this makes sense.. With this feature in SS I would actually see a reason to have a recyclebin.. I usually never use the recyclebin feature.. I might even say it would be nice if SS had a recyclebin option all by it self. One that could be configured to automatically be active on configurabl...
Are there any plans to maybe add a version that is U3 portable ? Or is it allready possible to install and use independent of the install? If so isnt an installer version possible. It is a growing market as far as i can tell. John Haller and the Portableapps.com site would be a nice platform to have...