Leading dots as extension separators
Posted: 25 Aug 2009, 13:02
From the 2.52 beta 2 changes list: 'Old hack removed: the dot in the beginning of the file name means the extension separator now. For example file ".txt" has the text file icon. Directories has no extension, the part behind the dot is just another part of the directory name.'
I personally do not like the consequences of this change.
In my experience, a leading dot is almost never meant as an extension. I have some (actually: many) files starting with a dot, most of them with a UNIXy origin, like .emacs, .bash_history, .NET, .cvsignore, ...
As I normally use a view with separated extension, these "extensions" are displayed separate from the other filenames, and cause a wide Ext column.
I think I understand the rationale, as Windows itself also regards a leading dot as an extension separator (evidenced by a Type of BASH_HISTORY File). Also, for examples like .txt, where the extension is "known" (by Windows), it would be ok.
Please reconsider the change.
I personally do not like the consequences of this change.
In my experience, a leading dot is almost never meant as an extension. I have some (actually: many) files starting with a dot, most of them with a UNIXy origin, like .emacs, .bash_history, .NET, .cvsignore, ...
As I normally use a view with separated extension, these "extensions" are displayed separate from the other filenames, and cause a wide Ext column.
I think I understand the rationale, as Windows itself also regards a leading dot as an extension separator (evidenced by a Type of BASH_HISTORY File). Also, for examples like .txt, where the extension is "known" (by Windows), it would be ok.
Please reconsider the change.