Search found 73 matches
- 24 May 2011, 00:32
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Can the IFileIsInUse Interface be used in Salamander?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5123
Can the IFileIsInUse Interface be used in Salamander?
If an app implements the IFileIsInUse Interfacethe Explorer shows which program has the file open if you try to move or delete that open file. Can this be used in Salamander, too like in this competitive tool http://blog.speedproject.de/2007/06/15/ ... verwendet/ ?
- 24 May 2011, 00:20
- Forum: Problems and Troubleshooting
- Topic: .reg files in internal viewer
- Replies: 11
- Views: 17303
Re: .reg files in internal viewer
any news about this issue? When do we get a fix?
- 09 May 2011, 22:39
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: What next? Vote please: x64 version or UAC support
- Replies: 74
- Views: 102224
Re: What next? Vote please: x64 version or UAC support
Any news about a 64Bit Beta? I switched to Win7 Sp1 x64 and i want to test the x64 bit version.
- 09 May 2011, 22:20
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Drag&drop from archives
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10173
Re: Drag&drop from archives
Current version supports drag&drop and clipboard operations only between 32-bit Explorer and Salamander. this doesn't work for me on a x86 Windows 7. In Version 2.5 I can use drag & drop or clipboard to extract 1 file of my choice. The version 2.54 doesn't support this. Does it work for you?
- 10 Mar 2010, 23:43
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Altap Salamander: UAC support
- Replies: 17
- Views: 20684
Re: Altap Salamander: UAC support
the caching in Explorer happens when you copy several files and this requires admin rights. Chaching UAC prompt for a context action which is separated in several actions is allowed and ok. But DO (in an older version) included a chaching for several minutes (configurable) and this is bad. I hope th...
- 10 Mar 2010, 23:12
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Altap Salamander: UAC support
- Replies: 17
- Views: 20684
Re: What next? Vote please: x64 version or UAC support
I know that. But I always put the slider on top to stop the MS Whitelist security flaw. With this UAC is fine!
And caching UAC elevation is bad!!!!!!
Every action must be approved otherwise we have the MS security flaw like we see in default config of Windows 7 UAC.
And caching UAC elevation is bad!!!!!!
Every action must be approved otherwise we have the MS security flaw like we see in default config of Windows 7 UAC.
- 10 Mar 2010, 23:02
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: [implemented] Support for Windows 7 task features
- Replies: 21
- Views: 25521
Re: Support for Windows 7 task features (jumplists, Progress
this was just a hint. We can later discuss this in detail and make a poll where the people can vote which function they want.
- 10 Mar 2010, 23:01
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Altap Salamander: UAC support
- Replies: 17
- Views: 20684
Re: What next? Vote please: x64 version or UAC support
I know of only two drawbacks when using two processes for UAC: - you have to develop some communication protocol between the two processes - you have to protect the communication protocol from command injection from malicious applications good points. That's why I don't like this way. But if you wa...
- 10 Mar 2010, 20:09
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: [implemented] Support for Windows 7 task features
- Replies: 21
- Views: 25521
Re: Support for Windows 7 task features (jumplists, Progress
Maybe also the latest used paths. I only wanted to know if you have plans to support it.
- 10 Mar 2010, 20:07
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Altap Salamander: UAC support
- Replies: 17
- Views: 20684
Re: What next? Vote please: x64 version or UAC support
why running 2 exe? I think the way the explorer does it is fine.
- 10 Mar 2010, 19:19
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: What next? Vote please: x64 version or UAC support
- Replies: 74
- Views: 102224
Re: What next? Vote please: x64 version or UAC support
I want UAC support. Put all the file operations in COM objects and use the moniker technique to deal with UAC. This is the greatest issue/request I have.
- 10 Mar 2010, 19:18
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: [implemented] Support for Windows 7 task features
- Replies: 21
- Views: 25521
Re: Support for Windows 7 task features (jumplists, Progress
Hi,
thanks for the response. Yes, the hotpaths in Jumplist whould be great, to easily open my favorite paths. And an option to enable/disable it would be great to. Not all people want to same functions.
Also the progressbar while copy/move would be great.
André
thanks for the response. Yes, the hotpaths in Jumplist whould be great, to easily open my favorite paths. And an option to enable/disable it would be great to. Not all people want to same functions.
Also the progressbar while copy/move would be great.
André
- 10 Mar 2010, 18:39
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: [implemented] Support for Windows 7 task features
- Replies: 21
- Views: 25521
[implemented] Support for Windows 7 task features
Hi,
do you have plans to support the new Windows 7 taskbar features?
Thanks
André
do you have plans to support the new Windows 7 taskbar features?
Thanks
André